cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [QA][DISCUSS] Should we document formal release criteria?
Date Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:15:01 GMT

On Mar 5, 2013, at 2:18 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
>>> So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is cut?
>> 
>> Personally, I've used the "no blockers and <5 critical with work
>> arounds" as the criteria, using the definitions I offered.
> 
> How many "Major" bugs are acceptable? Currently we have 187. Even if
> they're not going to completely disrupt use of the platform, it seems to
> me that releasing with >100 major bugs is a bit much.

Bit off-thread, but could we have a bug sprint ?

> 
> Best,
> 
> jzb
> -- 
> Joe Brockmeier
> jzb@zonker.net
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://www.dissociatedpress.net/


Mime
View raw message