cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
Date Sun, 10 Mar 2013 03:45:50 GMT
We're in good hands, thanks Radhika!

Ahmad

On Mar 9, 2013, at 1:31 AM, Radhika Puthiyetath <radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com> wrote:

> Ahmad, I am in the process of documenting the API changes for IPv6 support plus additional
info.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, March 09, 2013 12:50 AM
> To: Chip Childers
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Sheng Yang
> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
> 
> Oh no, I'm all for API only access, of ipv6 features, for 4.1. The UI can come down the
line... whoever wants to play with this feature will likely be okay with the experimental
template downloaded out of band too. Is this going to be documented somewhere?
> 
> 
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers 
>>> <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
>>>>> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members,
>>>>> 
>>>>> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like it isn't decided.  Do you have an opinion?
>>>> 
>>>> Do others?
>>>> 
>>>> Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus?
>>> 
>>> In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread...
>>> 
>>> I think we're OK with API only.
>> 
>> Ahmad is suggesting otherwise, but I'm in agreement with you.  Our 
>> next feature release is probably the right time to bring it into the UI.
>> 
>> Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it 
>> in the UI?
>> 
>>> 
>>> --Sheng
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of 
>>>>> documenting
>> this feature.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank You
>>>>> -Radhika
>>>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM
>>>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
>>>>> 
>>>>> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats 
>>>>> (system
>> template X).
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers 
>>>>>> <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default
for 
>>>>>>>> 4.1 release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6

>>>>>>>> to avoid confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --Sheng
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> So we talked about it being experimental.  Do you think we 
>>>>>>> should make experimental = API-based configuration only?  I 
>>>>>>> tend to lean that way
>>>>>> myself.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for 
>>>>>> potential
>> user
>>>>>> to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template 
>>>>>> support would be misleading.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --Sheng
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Mime
View raw message