cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Animesh Chaturvedi" <Animesh.Chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1
Date Wed, 27 Mar 2013 21:49:55 GMT


> On March 24, 2013, 6:08 p.m., Chip Childers wrote:
> > This patch still doesn't apply cleanly.  Now sure what's going on.  Please test
with a fresh copy of the 4.1 branch to ensure that it's a clean patch.
> > 
> > git am ~/patches/10071.patch
> > Applying: CS-1773: Disable baremetal functionality
> > error: patch failed: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java:359
> > error: server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java: patch does not apply
> > Patch failed at 0001 CS-1773: Disable baremetal functionality

Min applied the patch, closing the review


- Animesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/#review18329
-----------------------------------------------------------


On March 22, 2013, 11:55 p.m., Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated March 22, 2013, 11:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Kelven Yang and Frank Zhang.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Temporarily disabling baremetal functionality in CS 4.1
> 
> 
> This addresses bug CS-1773.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   client/pom.xml 38ba405 
>   client/tomcatconf/componentContext.xml.in ff7376e 
>   client/tomcatconf/nonossComponentContext.xml.in 35e1b28 
>   plugins/pom.xml 02459b4 
>   server/src/com/cloud/configuration/Config.java 17fe62b 
>   setup/db/db/schema-40to410.sql 754bfb6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10071/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Baremetal and Cisco UCS related APIs confirmed to not be exposed to clients.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Venkata Siva Vijayendra Bhamidipati
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message