cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:20:07 GMT
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members,
> 
> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?

Looks like it isn't decided.  Do you have an opinion?

Do others?

Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus?

> 
> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting this feature.
> 
> 
> Thank You
> -Radhika
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
> 
> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system template X).
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers 
> > <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 
> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid 
> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
> > >>
> > >> --Sheng
> > >>
> > >
> > > So we talked about it being experimental.  Do you think we should 
> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only?  I tend to lean 
> > > that way
> > myself.
> >
> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it.
> >
> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential user 
> > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template 
> > support would be misleading.
> >
> > --Sheng
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message