cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Joe Brockmeier <...@zonker.net>
Subject Re: [QA][DISCUSS] Should we document formal release criteria?
Date Tue, 05 Mar 2013 19:18:55 GMT
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 01:14 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 11:11:51AM -0800, Alex Huang wrote:
> > So in this definition, MAJOR and above must be fixed before a release is cut?
> 
> Personally, I've used the "no blockers and <5 critical with work
> arounds" as the criteria, using the definitions I offered.

How many "Major" bugs are acceptable? Currently we have 187. Even if
they're not going to completely disrupt use of the platform, it seems to
me that releasing with >100 major bugs is a bit much.
 
Best,

jzb
-- 
Joe Brockmeier
jzb@zonker.net
Twitter: @jzb
http://www.dissociatedpress.net/

Mime
View raw message