Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of henri.gomez@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.212.169 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAPbPdOY2i-J_oRmfLUroENyq=xekLP-qzpjVjC5+aiJzhM_yKw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <6DE00C9FDF08A34683DF71786C70EBF02F69715B@SBPOMB402.sbp.lan>
	<CANLSSBX-q1=v4YXd+c4kruetYvtTfosXhBuwOUGf7phODOG_Jw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVYj2Jb9A6YrdjJZ3RDhGVPO8Zhr_H=Oq+mSOE5AqFOFOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLSSBXsdtHYQntGQXLeoFZ7BeP46iyvua-7iBSu4v_5_KofiQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVbwavU-zb74pVVi2j=PKoYWo3SDA6=kP1eEDcuZOSx+Dw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLSSBXyPegiDRjmYSn3UPtuRzfoKjf1xxCatYv8ocWO2h2_Pw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVZhoA6y3z+AWghSwtH1im32+gVHJZOQ-iRSm3+r4-eb1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANLSSBXffHZv06dkRcQ3SM9h28zR+h9NXT7Gepb2G1n98B33Sw@mail.gmail.com>
	<7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F15861558@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
	<510F8E64.70906@widodh.nl>
	<CANc7MVxc102gWqGcoVj5y_JiHxLv4+WRS5Aa_q_ZfzV=fkOhEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<510FBC14.5000007@widodh.nl>
	<6DE00C9FDF08A34683DF71786C70EBF02F69CF06@SBPOMB402.sbp.lan>
	<510FEA33.5000101@widodh.nl>
	<5110178D.2050706@widodh.nl>
	<CALyUpY1g130GBENzoyrDtrMTrOmd+6qaeTTjgn1BJK2x0QZQTA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKprHVYmq5skY9Zz0dJuCv2hSqbSEZrJFds8H5LxpiTZibYARg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAPbPdOY2i-J_oRmfLUroENyq=xekLP-qzpjVjC5+aiJzhM_yKw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:07:59 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CALyUpY37eBch9VQ3HqLm3q+6L77JZ5MQSOC3Qa4jbCC2BGocYg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
From: Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com>
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Did bigtop infra provide a large choice of Linux distros ?
Better build packages for distro X under distro X.

2013/2/5 Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>:
> I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
> Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly focused on
> the Hadoop ecosystem currently, but at the very least it'd provide an
> infrastructure, some consistent guidelines on builds/layout/etc.
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:29 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Nice to see native packages for Cloudstack :
>> >
>> > https://github.com/noaresare/incubator-cloudstack/tree/master/packaging
>> >
>> > CentOS 6.3 and Debian.
>> >
>> >
>> > Did there is plan to add Fedora, openSUSE, SLES or will it be done by
>> > these distributions packagers ?
>> >
>>
>> So we have some openSuSE/SLES packagers on the list, and some Fedora
>> packagers as well (me at least) While we want them to be packaged, I
>> think the primary focus atm, is getting things working again.
>> Essentially the packages that are being created would be unacceptable
>> for inclusion in most distributions because we bundle jars. That
>> doesn't mean we can't publish repos that are consumable by those
>> distributions, but is another point to consider.
>>
>> --David
>>