Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A2BDE575 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 21:38:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89938 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2013 21:38:21 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89812 invoked by uid 500); 8 Feb 2013 21:38:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 89801 invoked by uid 99); 8 Feb 2013 21:38:21 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:38:21 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.244] (HELO na3sys009aog118.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.244) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:38:12 +0000 Received: from mail-vc0-f199.google.com ([209.85.220.199]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob118.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKURVwLiwPtb7FF81ytv63dW0en3Ewpvct@postini.com; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:51 PST Received: by mail-vc0-f199.google.com with SMTP id fo13so5340376vcb.2 for ; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent:x-gm-message-state; bh=SeG81z5NChZ4IOv3/Iqdofl4p2PSfBtpIsyP830Pgc0=; b=SvaGfsgnUcTao3RQhS/b+Tw/fZvebrzR6lg9buQ8xZRNtPsq9U63K1cwVxKy+LgUDA HfebtGvYD32b5MZlZnIwbx6VH5ZVn3BHjhWeBSc7Hdp1y4xWDUVSEYmGvAYdHr7keyKN ndFdI00AGEs3uTt2BXygD3yg0aKP8DtHaRQkvuow61zaJ09jETxnJI24hP4zXK4mf0w4 3iw4ebcLNLvuNzdX3wnw/uTLnNJt1uhOaz4b0NEzaVZiWA3QI/EoQdurojczb4WrzRRu O5bLVT4/IxFAnsi09dm8jXIvjkkHhWwulK+9tqrM0Y6RnseQwMpFcJ7Pl3qeSkEdwqgg dHhQ== X-Received: by 10.52.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr7579652vdj.74.1360359469890; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:49 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.52.35.129 with SMTP id h1mr7579645vdj.74.1360359469795; Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from USLT-205755.sungardas.corp ([216.203.6.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u5sm45568783vef.0.2013.02.08.13.37.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Feb 2013 13:37:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by USLT-205755.sungardas.corp (Postfix, from userid 76098887) id 6B401F123A91; Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:37:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 16:37:47 -0500 From: Chip Childers To: Anthony Xu Cc: 'David Nalley' , "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: [MERGE] Security Group in Advanced zone Message-ID: <20130208213747.GZ68204@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> References: <20130208183225.GK68204@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <20130208191948.GP68204@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <20130208201840.GR68204@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <20130208205208.GU68204@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8qRZvoNSGi76U6tOq1OjwCZNgqfG2ZdMB8+HyUuA/WOz09UDhK9EDQhnELeql4s90yQBNsFxVkP9bdbsBA/YkdaaNQYMh3q4FOTP5rDh19cMpc0ypOt1Ya0a6Xw8YqwD4vxYLraFiwPfNFEtFCJeCBOPIAzh4Bi3vl09HDhccS45Ps9SMR+QPPBVnUtJbUmw4rleg X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 01:27:46PM -0800, Anthony Xu wrote: > So we changed the criteria for merge, should we post a formal document for the criteria? In case someone is not aware of that. I'm not sure if we have *any* formal document somewhere, but that's a good idea! Do you want to start one? Or is there something that I'm not remembering (which would be great to be reminded of)? We have certainly had discussions about this in the past, see [1] and [2] for some examples. -chip [1] http://markmail.org/thread/s56ye76nohd23qir [2] http://markmail.org/message/df7npjqrepaqpv2j