cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rohit Yadav <bhais...@apache.org>
Subject Re: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:15:02 GMT
No, the file suggests this was already work of the requirejs project
from "The Dojo Foundation" with their licenses.
Since MIT license is available, it's compatible AL, but we still need
to attribute them in LICENSE.

Regards.

On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 5:38 PM, Pranav Saxena <pranav.saxena@citrix.com> wrote:
> Yeah right now the require.js file merged has this license -
>
> /** vim: et:ts=4:sw=4:sts=4
>  * @license RequireJS 2.1.2 Copyright (c) 2010-2012, The Dojo Foundation All Rights Reserved.
>  * Available via the MIT or new BSD license.
>  * see: http://github.com/jrburke/requirejs for details
>  */
> //Not using strict: uneven strict support in browsers, #392, and causes
> //problems with requirejs.exec()/transpiler plugins that may not be strict.
> /*jslint regexp: true, nomen: true, sloppy: true */
> /*global window, navigator, document, importScripts, jQuery, setTimeout, opera *
>
>
> This needs to be changed to the Apache licensing  , right ?
>
> Regards,
> Pranav
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: rohityadav89@gmail.com [mailto:rohityadav89@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 5:22 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Brian Federle
> Subject: License issue for js file from ui-plugins merge
>
> Hi Brian for you commit on master, can you fix the license for ui/lib/require.js?
> It suggests an external depedency require.js from Dojo Foundation. We need to attribute
them in LICENSE and fix other files so rat won't complain.
>
> Commit:
> commit 59c77b4850976b17af2b9ff7cceb051ae7b1e774
> Author: Brian Federle <brian.federle@citrix.com>
> Date:   Wed Dec 19 15:47:25 2012 -0800
>
> Regards.

Mime
View raw message