cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henri Gomez <henri.go...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Packaging in 4.1
Date Tue, 05 Feb 2013 10:07:59 GMT
Did bigtop infra provide a large choice of Linux distros ?
Better build packages for distro X under distro X.

2013/2/5 Andrew Bayer <andrew.bayer@gmail.com>:
> I should probably pipe up with my suggestion of getting CloudStack into
> Apache Bigtop here. =) http://bigtop.apache.org/ - it's mainly focused on
> the Hadoop ecosystem currently, but at the very least it'd provide an
> infrastructure, some consistent guidelines on builds/layout/etc.
>
> A.
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 12:29 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Henri Gomez <henri.gomez@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Nice to see native packages for Cloudstack :
>> >
>> > https://github.com/noaresare/incubator-cloudstack/tree/master/packaging
>> >
>> > CentOS 6.3 and Debian.
>> >
>> >
>> > Did there is plan to add Fedora, openSUSE, SLES or will it be done by
>> > these distributions packagers ?
>> >
>>
>> So we have some openSuSE/SLES packagers on the list, and some Fedora
>> packagers as well (me at least) While we want them to be packaged, I
>> think the primary focus atm, is getting things working again.
>> Essentially the packages that are being created would be unacceptable
>> for inclusion in most distributions because we bundle jars. That
>> doesn't mean we can't publish repos that are consumable by those
>> distributions, but is another point to consider.
>>
>> --David
>>

Mime
View raw message