cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Huang <>
Subject RE: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2013 00:20:33 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Sorensen []
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 3:29 PM
> To: Mike Tutkowski
> Cc: Edison Su;
> Subject: Re: Supporting SolidFire QoS Before 4.2
> He's saying that the VM can connect via iscsi directly to the
> solidfire device, rather than the host. You'd lose more performance
> that way and there's more overhead, but it would be a way to give
> individual VMs their own solidfire LUN.

I'm interested in your comment here.  Why do you think vm having direct iscsi access actually
lose performance?  I would think it's actually faster because there's nothing translating
the raw LUN into a raw disk.


View raw message