cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pradeep Soundararajan <pradeep.soundarara...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Review Request: Added a global package name in the packaging script
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 07:30:05 GMT
This will help us to resolve the problem only with package.sh script but we have to find a
way to resolve it globally by adding a global variable name.

Thanks,
Pradeep S

From: Wido den Hollander [mailto:noreply@reviews.apache.org] On Behalf Of Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 12:56 PM
To: Wido den Hollander; Hugo Trippaers
Cc: cloudstack; Pradeep Soundararajan
Subject: Re: Review Request: Added a global package name in the packaging script

This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9409/



Ship it!

Seems fine with me, but Hugo has the most RPM knowledge, so I'll let this up to him.



From what I understand, package.sh hasn't been used that much.


- Wido


On February 12th, 2013, 12:16 p.m., Pradeep Soundararajan wrote:
Review request for cloudstack, Hugo Trippaers and Wido den Hollander.
By Pradeep Soundararajan.

Updated Feb. 12, 2013, 12:16 p.m.

Description

Added a global package name in the packaging script


Diffs

 *   packaging/centos63/package.sh (5b1bab49b615e504273be3fe69335c10782d009a)

View Diff<https://reviews.apache.org/r/9409/diff/>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message