From cloudstack-dev-return-18810-apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 24 01:39:16 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E63CEEB26 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 51297 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 01:39:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51264 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jan 2013 01:39:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 51255 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jan 2013 01:39:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:39:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.42] (HELO mail-vb0-f42.google.com) (209.85.212.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:39:11 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id ff1so5771155vbb.15 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:38:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=n/Ax3zE2RfRBukzTEZ2Vsiwm1A2ZzBzrAal/lMrAQh8=; b=RKfrorll8VO/ItWMRdWXK1B/gJlPwheYlSoP1wMX1yYuF+BMpefcFQRDMJ8fsMbDTf W5fxpM+MOv9vwZaWE3SqjJRDkqfTLpkqP/4Y1MQCEuHXieE2PUJstjANnd846AeYbkXG lOzaKa+7yKKzsnHfoYCngc0pH6t/rUseVxxHfx/tq6BShso01ZWKArIKjTqhQyIszXjw KwSHTCvDJJhdmqENMOA8MRvQcl8r+SC6C/Ks1B+srPNvbwa5IxmMW+Yuj3PcAQd4mghM ddG6fYtANKyw692FW+OGUfC9ARs0i42mbrJeliHBnWR/Bt543Gy89zH2YGmjtHbuTWq6 UVLA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.18.147 with SMTP id w19mr183140vdd.94.1358991530325; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:38:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.38.5 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:38:50 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [63.110.51.11] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:38:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) From: Sheng Yang To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn55s2cdXokCYwBH6WIM8W912yig9oepiYHTvvaJVeOH5siSajJrH/CSxm7v9EE7NzamvfA X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah wrote: > Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it > assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors? Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first. --Sheng > > Regards, > Manan Shah > > > > > On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" wrote: > >>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander >>>wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote: >>>>> >>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway. This is >>>>>=B3by >>>>> design=B2. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that. >>>> >>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed. >>>> >>>> >>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do. >>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and >>>>>not >>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is >>>>>best to >>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way. >>>>> >>>> >>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it >>>>and warn >>>> that stuff can change. >>>> >>>> Wido >>> >>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it >>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases! >> >>+1.. >> >>--Sheng >