From cloudstack-dev-return-17836-apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Thu Jan 17 18:26:31 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3546EDB6 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:26:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43367 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 18:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43325 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jan 2013 18:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43315 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jan 2013 18:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:26:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.210.169] (HELO mail-ia0-f169.google.com) (209.85.210.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:26:22 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f169.google.com with SMTP id j5so664240iaf.14 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=wVAPk5z+1eouAhq75EEHXIGOX9ykkeLoHbv4KisTUAY=; b=ObxuORj+QfiYlhQr9X/FMFtoBRaAJbDdMha6yQk9XPl/w1URRTV3zdFwe/hgzlpTsU OV9uqf4hUyODA2lQZBDJTF4om61AQnJJQ5qARnmOTYM0Im5I5VxKcAcoVp5Cf0wTYHUr 3K/ytG1cWkx8EhlQqtT2r/HDmkE5nHRlOSfV3q5lIF74kzaQrcKvkcXu/mgc8+bzkWeM RP2t+eUnXyMia6yzwpJE+zbgB2iuoUmVllZ+/7Gnm2v0B07QUXqq9P9FO96UtBu2Dbe+ iWosiaAScj8SPmyOjysIJeK48f0IyTPQ13I0IX1I7r+m1ADsfqz3tgWU5zb6LgAkleTS UP5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.33.233 with SMTP id u9mr4606585igi.39.1358447161626; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.107.200 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:26:01 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [98.248.221.254] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:26:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) From: Sheng Yang To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkIpsTf5zjHBCreszNCPapI5uHe09OS4QhvkiQtnxDi+6AQsvAK20LnHJsZGyMmlkziAkWN X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Anthony Xu wrote: > My misunderstanding, I thought that's the link-local ip in Xenserver or KVM:-) > > If a VM is on both IPv6 and IPv4 network, what's the link-local address? IPv4? IPv6? Both? For dual stack case, we still require IPv6 link-local address only. --Sheng > > > Anthony > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org] >> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 10:13 AM >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Anthony Xu >> wrote: >> > Thanks for the write-up, >> > >> > One comment, >> > Is there any reason not use link-local IPv4 address? >> > >> >>*User VM would have one link-local IPv6 address >> >> IPv6 required one auto configured link local address per nic(means >> likely one nic would have more than one IP address, and in the >> different subnet), and the link local address would be used to send >> out DHCP request etc(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3315). It's also >> the basic of Neighbor discovery mechanism in >> IPv6(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4861). >> >> I think IPv4 link-local is less relevant in this case... >> >> --Sheng >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:11 PM >> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> >> Subject: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1) >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> The first draft of IPv6 FS is available at >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/IPv6+support >> >> now. >> >> >> >> Basically based on our previous discussion, we would like to stick >> to >> >> dnsmasq, and assume shared network for advance zone in the phase one, >> >> to make thing as simple as possible in phase 1. >> >> >> >> Comments/questions are welcome! >> >> >> >> --Sheng