cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Prasanna Santhanam (JIRA)" <>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-969) api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical network
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2013 09:47:12 GMT


Prasanna Santhanam commented on CLOUDSTACK-969:

Yes - I still see vlan in the ZoneResponse. The code still exists on master (commit e13d9327)
and on javelin (commit 4c1a69ac)
> api: zone response lists vlan in it as "vlan range of zone" but the vlan belongs to physical
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-969
>                 URL:
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>          Components: API
>    Affects Versions: 4.0.0
>            Reporter: Prasanna Santhanam
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: marvin
>             Fix For: 4.1.0
> While looking through CLOUDSTACK-968 I notice that the still contains
the vlan that used to be part of 2.2. This vlan now belongs to the
Right now shows up in Marvin's response classes for createZoneResponse
> public class ZoneResponse extends BaseResponse {
>  . ..
>     @SerializedName(ApiConstants.VLAN) @Param(description="the vlan range of the zone")
>     private String vlan;
> ..
> }
> public class PhysicalNetworkResponse extends BaseResponse {
> ...
>     @SerializedName(ApiConstants.VLAN) @Param(description="the vlan of the physical network")
>     private String vlan;
> ...
> }
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Marcus Sorensen <>wrote
> It seems that if I set a vlan range for a zone, marvin attempts to
> set that vlan range for every physical network defined for the zone. So the
> first one succeeds, the second one fails. The vlan property should be moved
> up to be a member of the physical network as far as marvin is concerned.
> We're in the process of making changes that allow you to use the same vlan
> numbers on different physical networks anyway, since it's possible that you
> can have completely separate infrastructure on each nic

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see:

View raw message