cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Manan Shah <manan.s...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
Date Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:15:30 GMT
Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it
assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors?

Regards,
Manan Shah




On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:

>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers
><chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>>>
>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway.  This is
>>>>³by
>>>> design².
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that.
>>>
>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do.
>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and
>>>>not
>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is
>>>>best to
>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it
>>>and warn
>>> that stuff can change.
>>>
>>> Wido
>>
>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it
>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases!
>
>+1..
>
>--Sheng

Mime
View raw message