cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix
Date Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:21:25 GMT
+1.

On 1/18/13 12:00 AM, "Sateesh Chodapuneedi"
<sateesh.chodapuneedi@citrix.com> wrote:

>+1
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:jessica.tomechak@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 18 January 2013 12:15
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various
>> features" from Citrix
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>>
>> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:51 PM
>> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various
>> > features" from Citrix
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi <
>> > animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > > Reposting with subject line VOTE.
>> > >
>> > > Committers have binding votes for this decision.
>> > >
>> > > Please respond with your vote:
>> > > +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this
>> > > +enhancement to CloudStack
>> > > in via the IP clearance process
>> > > +0 - Don't care
>> > > -1 - Do not accept the donation
>> > >
>> > > This vote will remain open for ~72 hours.
>> > >
>> > > Content Location: http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak
>> > >
>> >
>> > I think it would be best to have an archive file, and an md5 checksum
>> > to go along with it.  I'd like to vote for those artifacts instead of
>> > what's provided please.  It will make the ip clearance process easier.
>> >
>> >
>> I have provided an archive file and checksum. However I wonder whether
>>it
>> would be better to provide separate files for each feature, so they can
>>be
>> voted on separately. Please let me know.
>>
>> Jessica T.
>>
>>
>> > >
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:Jessica.Tomechak@citrix.com]
>> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:05 PM
>> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > >>
>> > >> On people.apache.org/~jtomechak, I have posted all my docs related
>> > >> to the bug items in the IP Clearance list which Animesh provided.
>> > >>
>> > >> I have made notations in the Doc sub-task of each bug, so that
>> > >> anyone reviewing the proposed feature can easily find the
>> documentation.
>> > >>
>> > >> In addition, I made a note for myself of the doc status of each bug
>> > >> in that list, and here it is for anyone who is interested!
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-774 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 5000 lines Contributor : Frank IP
>> > >> Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: None exist. This was not announced or supported as a Citrix
>> > >> CP
>> > >> 3.0.6 feature.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-306 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes in October Contribution Size Approx:
>> > >> 1500 lines Contributor : Sheng IP Clearance needed initial
>> > >> recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: Already submitted via reviewboard. Link and info in doc
>>subtask.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-777/700 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 500 lines Contributor :
>> > >> Kishan/Jayapal/Rajesh/Murali IP Clearance needed initial
>> > >> recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL and notations in the doc subtask
>> > >> of
>> > the bug.
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-778/319 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: should be small Contributor : Vijayendra
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: This is a trivial issue
>> > >> so may be no
>> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Info is in the doc subtask of the
>>bug.
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-299 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: UI code is there but backend is not Functional
>> > >> Spec
>> > Posted:
>> > >> Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 1400
>> > >> lines Contributor : Jayapal IP Clearance needed initial
>> > >> recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Link is provided in the description
>> > >> of
>> > the bug.
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-297 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No, but posted on review board Functional Spec
>> > >> Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size
>>Approx:
>> > >> 350 lines Contributor : Hari IP Clearance needed initial
>>recommendation:
>> > >> Docs: One paragraph of new docs on people.a.o. The URL is noted in
>> > >> the doc subtask of the bug.
>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-297/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-197 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Multiple patches posted on review board
>> > >> Functional Spec
>> > >> Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size
>>Approx:
>> > >> 3000 lines Contributor : Likitha IP Clearance needed initial
>> > >> recommendation: No, since incremental patches were posted over a
>> > >> period
>> > >> Docs: Believe docs already exist, authored on the community side by
>> > >> Sebastien G.
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-192 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes, but no consensus reached
>> > >> Contribution Size
>> > >> Approx: 1000 lines Contributor : Sanjay IP Clearance needed initial
>> > >> recommendation: Yes, if community agrees to feature inclusion
>> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the
>>bug.
>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-192/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-304 / 784 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 600
>> > >> Contributor : Alena
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since commits were
>> > >> done way back in October over a period of 1 week
>> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the
>>bug.
>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-265 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 450
>> > >> Contributor : Murali
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL is noted in the doc subtask of
>> > >> the
>> > bug.
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-737 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 2000
>> > >> Contributor : Anthony
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > >> Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the
>>bug.
>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-177 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 300
>> > >> Contributor : Brian
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits
>> > >> over several days
>> > >> Docs: None were written, probably none needed
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-662 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 500
>> > >> Contributor : Brian
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits
>> > >> over several days
>> > >> Docs: None were written, probably none needed
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-176 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: 200
>> > >> Contributor : Pranav
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits
>> > >> over several days
>> > >> Docs: None needed
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-312 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx:
>> > >> Contributor : Murali
>> > >> IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Potentially yes,
>> > >> multiple commits in one day
>> > >> Docs: Pending on reviewboard. The URL is noted in the Doc subtask
>> > >> of
>> > the bug.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> CLOUDSTACK-873 :
>> > >> Code in ACS repo: No
>> > >> Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > >> Community Discussion Done: No
>> > >> Contribution Size Approx: Work not started Contributor :
>> > >> Vijayendra/ Kelven IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No
>> > >> as work has not
>> > started on it yet.
>> > >> Preliminary investigation done, running into issues with vmware.
>> > >> Docs: No existing docs.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Jessica Tomechak
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
>> > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:25 PM
>> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > >>
>> > >> I am waiting for code to be posted to start the IP clearance
>> > >> process for the ones identified in my email. Let me send reminders.
>> > >>
>> > >> > -----Original Message-----
>> > >> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> > >> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:19 PM
>> > >> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> > Subject: Re: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>> > >> > <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > >> > > To keep the community posted on status on IP clearance. I
have
>> > >> > > followed up
>> > >> > with the contributors of the issues mentioned, as soon as the
>> > >> > code is posted publicly, we will start the IP clearance review
>>process.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Thanks
>> > >> > > Animesh
>> > >> >
>> > >> > Animesh (others) - are there any challenges that you need help
>> > >> > with in getting this done?
>> > >
>> >
>> >


Mime
View raw message