cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2013 07:02:15 GMT
Thanks Rajesh.
Is the feature going to be supported only with NetScaler devices?
There's a few places where it says Virtual Router.

Features should be developed on feature branches.
Can you document the exact API?
IIRC, there is no other CS API that begins with "configure"


On 1/7/13 10:53 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:

>FS is created for this feature at
>https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html
>This is initially discussed in the ticket
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443
>
>Thanks
>Rajesh Battala
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>instances
>
>I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement.
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+Healt
>h
>+checks
>
>Regards,
>Manan Shah
>
>
>
>
>On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.battala@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>instances
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>instances
>>
>>> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the
>>> specific proposal.  I understand that you are proposing Netscaler and
>>> HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to only
>>> volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5 support be
>>> upgraded to support this feature as well.
>>> 
>>> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 support
>>> was added to CS?  Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did it?
>>> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's
>>> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in
>>> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's not
>>> necessarily a negative if they were).  Does anyone want to take this
>>> on and work with Rajesh?
>>> 
>>
>>F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com.
>>
>>On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should
>>create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature.
>>
>>--Alex
>>
>>
>>We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each
>>Hardware resource. I will create those tickets.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rajesh Battala
>>
>>
>>Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources.
>>Here are the tickets.
>>
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health monitoring
>>for F5 load balanced instances
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health monitoring
>>for NetScaler load balanced instances
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health monitoring
>>for HAProxy load balanced instances
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health monitoring
>>for Brocade load balanced instances
>>
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rajesh Battala
>


Mime
View raw message