cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
Date Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:38:50 GMT
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah <manan.shah@citrix.com> wrote:
> Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it
> assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors?

Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first.

--Sheng
>
> Regards,
> Manan Shah
>
>
>
>
> On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers
>><chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway.  This is
>>>>>³by
>>>>> design².
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that.
>>>>
>>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do.
>>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic and
>>>>>not
>>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is
>>>>>best to
>>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it
>>>>and warn
>>>> that stuff can change.
>>>>
>>>> Wido
>>>
>>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it
>>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases!
>>
>>+1..
>>
>>--Sheng
>

Mime
View raw message