cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
Date Fri, 18 Jan 2013 20:16:30 GMT
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu@citrix.com> wrote:
> Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
> router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?

Dual-stack is one interface has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.

If there is dual-stack, it must be at both user VM and router VM, at
public interface.

Link-local interface of router is still there even it's IPv6 only on
public interface.

--Sheng
>
>
> Anthony
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
>> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
>> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work?
>>
>> I think it would be stage 2 of phase 1, after ipv6 stack only.
>>
>> --Sheng
>> >
>> > On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang <Alex.Huang@citrix.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1.
>> The
>> >>>> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends
>> on
>> >>>> how much time we have.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> How do you present something like this to the end user if it works
>> one
>> >>>way and not another.  It needs to be consistent.
>> >>>
>> >>Let's get the DNS/DHCP part done first...
>> >>
>> >>--Sheng
>> >

Mime
View raw message