cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
Date Wed, 09 Jan 2013 21:18:27 GMT
Sure Devdeep can provide the details

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:00 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> 
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Hari Kannan <hari.kannan@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Hi Chip,
> >
> > I will let Animesh comment on the IP/repo stuff - regarding the other
> > 2 topics you raised
> >
> > - I wouldn't claim code at a  "done" level yet - we did develop code
> > to a sufficient level to demo, but it would need some more work for
> > sure. It hadn't made it as part of any Citrix commercial product
> > either - it was developed, showcased but hasn't yet seen the light of
> > the day
> 
> Understood...  so perhaps there isn't a design document.  Perhaps the author of
> the code (not sure who it is) wouldn't mind adding some basic design elements
> to the FS wiki page.  That will help the community evaluate the inclusion of the
> donated code.
> 
> > - Regarding the XS part, it has been developed/tested only for XS - however,
> the feature is not restricted for XS - in other words, unlike the host updates,
> which was meant to be for XS only, this feature eventually must support all
> hypervisors (or even baremetal servers) - at this time, it has been developed
> for XS only..
> >
> 
> Excellent.  I'd like to see that reflected in the design / code as well, but glad to
> hear it was a consideration!
> 
> > Hari
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 12:52 PM
> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Support for Intel TXT technology
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:44 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> >> <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>> This came in as I was following up on  action item from IRC today. This
> feature is something that has already been developed before ACS 4.0 and
> processes were formalized and also had been demonstrated in public forms
> such as in Intel Developers Forum last Sept but somehow missed getting filed.
> Can we consider it as an exception and take it for 4.1.  I understand we are few
> days past cutoff,  I will ensure we are more diligent in future.
> >>>
> >>> Animesh
> >>
> >>
> >> Is the code already in the repo? Or was it developed externally?
> >>
> >
> > Good question.  My previous email made the assumption that it was not
> currently in the project repo, but I could certainly be mistaken.
> >
> > -chip
> >

Mime
View raw message