cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From John Kinsella <...@stratosec.co>
Subject Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened
Date Fri, 11 Jan 2013 19:40:46 GMT
+1
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:22 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:

> IMO, no.  I want the first issue resolved first (revert the code that
> shouldn't be in the repo).  Then we can talk about accepting the
> donation proposal I assume is coming.
> 
> But this is just my opinion.  Anyone else?
> 
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
> <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> Chip
>> 
>> Should we expedite IP clearance process and avoid having to revert commits?
>> 
>> Thanks
>> Animesh
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 11:07 AM
>>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened
>>> 
>>> Sheng and Murali,
>>> 
>>> Due to the nature of the commits below (CLOUDSTACK-306 and CLOUDSTACK-
>>> 312), and where the master branch HEAD is currently, reverting these commits
>>> is non-trivial for me to have faith in getting right.
>>> 
>>> Prior to us moving forward with these features coming through IP clearance, I
>>> would ask that the two of you spend the time necessary to revert the changes
in
>>> the repo.
>>> 
>>> Please let the community know when the reverts are done.
>>> 
>>> -chip
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Chip Childers
>>>> <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-306
>>>>>    42c8c73ab6437d86578f7f6d7b48a96a2de29bec
>>>>>    177e157cbfa40af82de628cb00876678d7646d2d
>>>>>    717f9dcd4d25e2a3ccf12598d16cc5d81fd880a9
>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-312
>>>>>    7fcfcdf91e49d64375171c9ae7fe61067aa59b6e
>>>>>    d4c604cfd8ec6b385de7abf694a936e89add0f38
>>>>>    6657246cd44629c30e6ea21cc4bbd43a42788e12
>>>>>    0de5a145e4f06420a4eb1867309af674c16ace7c
>>>>>    28bbf6c52798c9bd298952844250fbc3cb92dce0
>>>> 
>>>> The commits above have conflicts for a clean revert.  This will take
>>>> some time to clean up.
>>>> 
>>>>> CLOUDSTACK-800
>>>>>    106730ccdde30450e96d080ed6c9791682fb7300
>>>> 
>>>> The commit above has been reverted.
>>>> 
>>>> -chip
>> 
> 

Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service
o: 415.315.9385
@johnlkinsella


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message