Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 462C4D9FE for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 39205 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2012 22:25:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39170 invoked by uid 500); 14 Dec 2012 22:25:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 39162 invoked by uid 99); 14 Dec 2012 22:25:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:25:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jzb@zonker.net designates 66.111.4.28 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.28] (HELO out4-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.28) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 22:25:45 +0000 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825B0207A0 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:25:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:25:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=p5aTvBbugCSgojL+KFHsijBIPtg=; b=H+ZRYvHFB21y+QBC0m28bZyR3Eys DM4ai8ex5NXuHPh00qOvAM4gRZ9EI6goJDkRx+eLWSoSjrJe46wloqF2Ih7bz+wM gLvlGgiXeaxN6+MmMR5skj5imJ6i2kTvzBsqvLjSJcU4YQzraUiBowkTEil6q1G7 F6uCSqoas700Vdg= X-Sasl-enc: XsnMG4GDILqreltOp4ac4UovhW8LffYYvrrGEQefM6OU 1355523925 Received: from localhost (unknown [38.96.16.67]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2701A4827C1 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:25:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:55:09 -0600 From: Joe Brockmeier To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Email Conventions : Subject Line Prefixes Message-ID: <20121213205509.GB18305@localhost.localdomain> References: <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E012DA27F45D4@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E012DA27F46D8@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E012DA27F489E@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7A92FF96DF135843B4B608FB576BFC3E012DA27F489E@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 01:56:26PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > > Thanks for clarifying Chip. I will also like to drop PROPOSAL. If there is no > > objection by tomorrow I will remove it from the table Wiki edits are no biggie to change/revert, but generally "by tomorrow" doesn't leave a lot of time for discussion / response. 72 hours is generally the standard for lazy consensus. (Not saying it's necessary in this case, but I don't want to start a tradition of "respond in 24 hours or X happens.") Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier http://dissociatedpress.net/ Twitter: @jzb