cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Xu <Xuefei...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
Date Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:09:43 GMT
Some questions,

Will CS support IPv6 in basic zone/network?
Does that mean CS support both host and guest IPv6 in 4.1?

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:02 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [ASFCS41] IPv6 Support
> 
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:45 AM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers
> > <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> >> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 12/19/12 12:44 PM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:12 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> >>>>> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Since it is a vast topic, I added subtasks in the Jira bug to
> make it
> >>>>>>more
> >>>>>> manageable.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-
> 452?subTaskView=all#iss
> >>>>>>uet
> >>>>>> able
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is indeed a massive feature - are you sure that this is
> >>>>> achievable in the 4.1 timeframe???
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --David
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>I don't see fix versions of the Jira records set to 4.1.0.  I'm
> going
> >>>>to set them to the "Future" release as fix version, and if the
> folks
> >>>>developing the feature are able to pull some component into 4.1.0,
> we
> >>>>can discuss that specifically.
> >>>
> >>> I see that the subtasks have been moved into separate bugs. For the
> >>> record, these are
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-673 to CLOUDSTACK-
> 679
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> They are all still sub tasks of the parent though...  I just changed
> >> the fix versions of the parent and child tasks.
> >
> > I think for 4.1, we can get non-isolated network works. Because it
> > only involved DNS and DHCP, should be a nice first step.
> >
> > For LB and firewall, that's much more complex, we can do it later.
> >
> > --Sheng
> 
> One question regarding security group in advance network. Anyone has
> an estimate on how much effort it would take to support ipv6 with it?
> If we would have dual stack.
> 
> --Sheng

Mime
View raw message