Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
References: 
 <D2EE6B3265AD864EB3EA4F5C670D256F24A5C7@EXMBX01L-CRP-03.webmdhealth.net>
 <67EF18FDCA335F489B366120481AB6C5F69D8BAB59@BANPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
 <D2EE6B3265AD864EB3EA4F5C670D256F24AC2B@EXMBX01L-CRP-03.webmdhealth.net>
 <67EF18FDCA335F489B366120481AB6C5F69D8BAB61@BANPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
From: Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: 
 <67EF18FDCA335F489B366120481AB6C5F69D8BAB61@BANPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:29:57 -0500
Message-ID: <-5754230778814413436@unknownmsgid>
Subject: Re: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1
To: "<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>"
 <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Has the master branch really diverged that much at this point?  Also,
I think Ilya has mostly been using the 4.0 release anyway (but we can
wait for confirmation of that).

- chip

Sent from my iPhone.

On Nov 26, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Pranav Saxena <pranav.saxena@citrix.com> wrote:

> I think you are right then . We should definitely back port them to 4.0 as well but I am not very sure , if we can reproduce all of them there . If you could reproduce these issues once on 4.0 , I can backport the fixes immediately .
>
> Thanks,
> Pranav
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 2:23 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1
>
> Pranav,
>
> They have been all addressed but are not on 4.0 branch, my request is to backport them to 4.0 to be available on 4.0.1 release.
>
> Is it not applicable to 4.0?
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pranav Saxena [mailto:pranav.saxena@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 4:52 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1
>
> Few of the bugs mentioned below have been fixed by me and the code changes have been pushed into asf/master . The remaining ones also seem to have been addressed . Could you please verify once more ?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Pranav
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net]
> Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 12:11 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Backport UI fixes to 4.0.1
>
> jzb - below is the list of bugs that should be minimally impacting and are UI changes
>
>
> Least intrusive - UI Changes
> ---
> CLOUDSTACK-474
> Create NetworkOffering wizard should provide dropdown for LB isolation when LB is set to External devices & guest_type is set to Shared
> ---
> CLOUDSTACK-475
> cloudstack UI - create network offering - Hide VPC checkbox when Guest Type is Shared. Show it when Guest Type is Isolated.
> ----
> CLOUDSTACK-476
> cloudstack UI - create network offering - Supported Source NAT type dropdown - set "Per zone" as default option.
> ----
> CLOUDSTACK-477
> cloudstack UI - zone wizard - When Advanced/SecurityGroup is selected, pass forVirtualNetwork=false to createVlanIpRange API.
> ----
> CLOUDSTACK-439
> Alert with typo and outdated text regarding "direct attached public IPs"
>
>
> Additional least intrusive nice to haves
>
> ----
> CLOUDSTACK-523
> When adding Vms to an LB rule , when there are vms with display name that were provided by user and autogenearated uuid , the list vm screen extends beyond the frames original width..
> ----
> CLOUDSTACK-459
> [Optional Public IP assignment for EIP with Basic Zone] Associate IP Checkbox in Create Network Offering Dialog is Displayed When Elastic LB is Selected
> ----
>
>
> I will file more bug reports that I was under impression - have been addressed by above- but as I reviewed the bug details - I don't believe they have been addressed.
>
> Thanks
> ilya
>
>
>
>
>
>