cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Marcus Sorensen <shadow...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] releases going forward
Date Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:07:55 GMT
Not necessarily, I wasn't picturing a scenario where we release in lock
step with a platform so much as just jumping to the next gen of platforms
when it makes sense. Although I get the point, this could be tricky.
On Oct 31, 2012 8:58 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 07:16:28PM -0600, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> > We could also do something else like align major revs with target
> > platforms, e.g. 4.0 targets centos 6.x and Ubuntu 12.04, with minor revs
> > being feature releases. That may help solidify the support life cycle as
> > well, and we just rev when the next generation of platforms is chosen and
> > tested.
>
> The problem with targeting major revs with target platforms is that the
> primary target platforms aren't on similar development cycles.
>
> CentOS follows RHEL, which isn't on the same cadence as Ubuntu LTS. If
> we're picking a platform to base the release cycles on, we'd have to
> choose between one or the other.
> --
> Joe Brockmeier
> Twitter: @jzb
> http://dissociatedpress.net/
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message