Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50783772.6050505@widodh.nl>
References: 
 <33740054EBF5B64BB213E2E0916F2C13EC3C1A6614@BANPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
	<50783772.6050505@widodh.nl>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 11:34:33 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CA+96GG6svMyVAZAzT_om5bkWecOZhtMGvkG=NJvdi3LMO3pUJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Integrating autoscale branch to master?
From: Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10/12/2012 05:09 PM, Vijay Venkatachalam wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have rebased autoscale branch against master and testing on a private
>> setup.
>> If all unit test cases work fine,  the plan is to rebase once again on
>> Monday (15th October India Time) and get autoscale to master.
>>
>> Any concerns/comments?
>>
>
> I can't talk about the stability of the code, but I think we agreed that
> autoscale could be merged in after 4.0?

+1 - after 4.0 please

> I'm not against it being merged in.
>
> Wido
>
>
>> I have asked Pranav for help and he has agreed to commit.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Vijay V.
>>
>