Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA25ADA92 for ; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:06:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11474 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2012 18:06:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11443 invoked by uid 500); 10 Oct 2012 18:06:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11435 invoked by uid 99); 10 Oct 2012 18:06:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:06:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of will.chan@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.89] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 18:06:10 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,565,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="40793677" Received: from sjcpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 10 Oct 2012 18:05:34 +0000 Received: from SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.216.4.72]) by SJCPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.216.14.75]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:05:33 -0700 From: Will Chan To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org" Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:05:30 -0700 Subject: RE: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging Thread-Topic: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging Thread-Index: Ac2nAsI7JNahKzunTJ6Uxn/cacTiJQAAzjaQAALw43A= Message-ID: <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D40129322E89EC@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <50759F11.8060203@widodh.nl> <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D40129322E8974@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> In-Reply-To: <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D40129322E8974@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 QA is going to verify both builds. When they are done, Sudha or myself wil= l send something to the dev list. Will > -----Original Message----- > From: Will Chan [mailto:will.chan@citrix.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:41 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: RE: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging >=20 > Is this for OSS or non-OSS build? The reason I ask is because Citrix QA > verified that the OSS build was working last night. >=20 > Will >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 9:17 AM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [ASF40] AWS API Ubuntu packaging > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Wido den Hollander > > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > The last couple of hours I've worked on the last blocker, the AWS > > packaging > > > for Ubuntu. > > > > > > I made the package depend on a couple of JAR files from the Ubuntu > > > repository since: > > > A. We don't have to package them, they are already available in the > > > repo B. They conflict with other packages (See commit messages). > > > > > > I just build the packages from the 4.0 branch and tested them (build > > > & > > > deploy) on a fresh 12.04 system and the AWS API seems to deploy, I > > haven't > > > fired any commands at it however. > > > > > > I also removed the postinst stuff and moved it to the debian/rules > > > file so that it gets packaged (commit: > > 3854de46ce6e2eaf81de695c31e37f0f77228938) > > > > > > I'd like to have this verified by another pair of eyes, but I think > > > it's working. > > > > > > Wido > > > > > > > Can one of the test engineers please do a sanity test now?