Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4AE0DBCD for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 77154 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2012 18:32:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77109 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2012 18:32:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 77101 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2012 18:32:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:32:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: unknown mxinclude:zoho.com~all (athena.apache.org: encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of jlk@stratosec.co) Received: from [65.55.88.11] (HELO tx2outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com) (65.55.88.11) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:32:43 +0000 Received: from mail159-tx2-R.bigfish.com (10.9.14.246) by TX2EHSOBE015.bigfish.com (10.9.40.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:22 +0000 Received: from mail159-tx2 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail159-tx2-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E1140061 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.236.101;KIP:(null);UIP:(null);IPV:NLI;H:BY2PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com;RD:none;EFVD:NLI X-SpamScore: -2 X-BigFish: PS-2(zz98dI9371I1102Ic85dh1432I4015Izz1d18h1202h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz17326ah8275bh8275dh177df4hz2dh2a8h668h839hd25he5bhf0ah107ah1288h12a5h12bdh137ah139eh1441h1155h) Received: from mail159-tx2 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail159-tx2 (MessageSwitch) id 1349548340253954_11062; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (unknown [10.9.14.238]) by mail159-tx2.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FA93E005B for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BY2PRD0510HT001.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.236.101) by TX2EHSMHS040.bigfish.com (10.9.99.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:19 +0000 Received: from [10.2.3.121] (64.9.231.142) by pod51010.outlook.com (10.255.84.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.207.9; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 18:32:18 +0000 From: John Kinsella Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B807F5B-0903-48C7-BA5E-3E77F7C2FB9E" Message-ID: <3F45750C-FA06-4C09-B5EA-986B567A05FC@stratosec.co> MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.1 \(1498\)) Subject: Re: Moving JIRA emails to a separate list Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 11:31:44 -0700 References: <4C703E46-40C8-4DB4-AD15-E5CFF59880B6@stratosec To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1498) X-Originating-IP: [64.9.231.142] X-OriginatorOrg: stratosec.co X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --Apple-Mail=_2B807F5B-0903-48C7-BA5E-3E77F7C2FB9E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Ah, from an archive standpoint, totally makes sense. On Oct 6, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > I'm already deploying filters, for sure. But the mail-archives are very > messy and hard to use right now, and I'm thinking it might be hard for > people just getting started with the project. > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > >> From my POV I don't think it's going to change much for the committers, >> but have at it. The Jira emails already have a distinguishing subject... >> >> On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Outback Dingo >> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>> wrote: >>>> +1 >>>> >>> >>> ++1 their clouding whats relevant for users, and relevant for developers >>> >>> >>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>> >>>> Op 6 okt. 2012 om 02:46 heeft "Noah Slater" het >> volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>>> Community, >>>>> >>>>> I propose we move JIRA emails to a separate list. >>>>> >>>>> This should increase the signal:noise for the list for new >> contributors and >>>>> lurkers. >>>>> >>>>> If we did this, I would suggest that we make it a project bylaw that >> all >>>>> committers subscribe to the issues list. >>>>> >>>>> If I don't hear any objections, I will assume consensus through >> silence and >>>>> take care of this for us. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> NS >>> >> >> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service >> o: 415.315.9385 >> @johnlkinsella >> >> > > > -- > NS Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service o: 415.315.9385 @johnlkinsella --Apple-Mail=_2B807F5B-0903-48C7-BA5E-3E77F7C2FB9E--