cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] About shipping a non-OSS CloudStack
Date Mon, 01 Oct 2012 08:24:51 GMT
Just one follow up. Someone on the Incubator thread mentioned that we
should be fine as long as it is legal for us to distribute them.
(Irrespective of their compatibility with the Apache license.) Do you know
whether this is the case?

On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 10:52 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:

>
>
>
>
> On Sep 30, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> > Poor choice of words. :) I've asked a question on general@incuabtorabout
> > this now. I presume the jars have since been removed from HEAD. Is that
> > right? And what license were they distributed under?
> >
> >
>
> They have all (to my knowledge) been removed.
> Some were under VMwares SDK license, which does permit some redistribution
> in certain cases, others were under the NetApp SDK license for which I am
> unaware of the terms but it was posted to the list some time back.
>
> Those are the only two that jump to mind that weren't under some sort of
> an open source license, but my memory might be fallible.
>
> --David
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 8:48 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
> wrote:
> >>> My concern is that we're hosting non-OS software on ASF infrastructure
> >> that
> >>> people are actually downloading for convenience! I am not sure what the
> >>> policy is around non-OS software that has been mistakenly committed.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It wasn't mistakenly committed.
> >> It was originally in the codebase when we imported it to the ASF.
> >>
> >> --David
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> >
> > --
> > NS
>



-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message