cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simon Weller <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round
Date Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:58:10 GMT

We've been testing our own rolled nonoss RPMS pulled from the 4.0.0-incubating git repo. 

Our testing has been focused on RHEL/SL 6.3 for both management and hosts : 

Configuration and Install 


CLVM functionality for primary storage (multiple primary storage profiles with tagging) 

Advanced Networking with both isolated and shared network profiles 
HA components. 
Domain Accounts 
VM profile changes (service profiles, network profiles et al) 
Templated + ISO installs 
KVM Snapshoting 
Firewalling in advanced networking 
Port Forwarding in advanced networking 
ELB in advanced networking 
Source NAT configuration 
Management GUI functionality 

VM hosts: Various flavours of RHEL based 5.x and 6.x linux (64 bit) 

Windows 2003 32 bit (both IDE and para virt (virtio) via an internal patch) 

Windows 2008 R2 32 and 64 bit (both IDE and para virt (virtio) via an internal patch) 

We're very happy with the state of the release. 

- Si 

----- Original Message -----

From: "Chip Childers" <> 
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2012 11:40:40 AM 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.0.0-incubating Release, third round 

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Olivier Lamy <> wrote: 
> +1 (binding). 
> I checked sigs, license headers: sounds good. 
> A minor point is the KEYS file available here 
> . 
> Perso I would prefer to see it in a scm (most of Apache do that). 
> Maybe for next release using svnpubsub for dist (at least it will be 
> in svn and available with distrib) 
> Let me know if I can help to setup this process. 


Noah advised us to remove the KEYS file from our source tree earlier. 

I'll be putting it in the dist folder (URL will be ). My 
understanding is that (after the IPMC vote) I simply copy the files 
from my p.a.o public_html space to the correct folder on that server, 
and then the mirrors start picking it up. Is there actually an SVN 
method of adding the artifacts to the dist folder? 


> 2012/10/22 Chip Childers (ASF) <>: 
>> Hi All, 
>> I would like to call a vote for Apache CloudStack (Incubating) Release 
>> 4.0.0-incubating (third round). 
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release 
>> artifacts, so that any critical issues can be resolved before the 
>> release is made. The more time that each individual spends reviewing 
>> the artifacts, the higher confidence we can have in both the release 
>> itself and our ability to pass an IPMC vote later on. Everyone is free 
>> to vote on this release, so please give it a shot. 
>> Instructions for Validating and Testing the artifacts can be found here: 

>> If you have any trouble setting up a test environment using the 
>> procedure above, please ask on the cloudstack-dev@i.a.o list. Someone 
>> will be sure to help, and we'll improve our test procedure 
>> documentation at the same time! 
>> Now, on to the specifics of what we are voting on... 
>> The following artifacts are up for the vote: 

>> PGP release keys (signed using A99A5D58): 
>> Branch: 4.0 
>> Commit: 6355965dcd956811dd471a9d03c73dadcf68f480 
>> List of changes: 

>> The artifacts being voted on during this round also include the 
>> following additional fixes (most were identified as part of testing 
>> during the last round of voting): 
>> * Many documentation fixes (particularly the release notes and 
>> installation guide) 
>> * CLOUDSTACK-341: Failing to display Management Traffic Details on the UI 
>> * CLOUDSTACK-349: Russian l10n not properly displaying 
>> * Correction to the devcloud rdeploy build target, to make testing easier 
>> * CLOUDSTACK-363: Upgrades from 2.2.14, 3.0.2 to the Current build will fail 
>> * CLOUDSTACK-118: Status of host resorce stuck in "ErrorInMaintenance" 
>> * DISCLAIMER added to the Marvin tool dir 
>> The vote will be open for 72 hours. 
>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PPMC and IPMC members please be 
>> sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? 
>> [ ] +1 approve 
>> [ ] +0 no opinion 
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) 
>> Thanks! 
> -- 
> Olivier Lamy 
> Talend: 
> | 

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message