cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edison Su <Edison...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: RPM build is fixed, sort of...
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2012 21:25:26 GMT
Yah, I noticed this issue in QA's environment yesterday. I'll take a look at it.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadowsor@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 2:20 PM
> To: Edison Su
> Cc: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...
> 
> Ok. Perhaps this is not the place, but I'm a little tripped up due to
> my lack of java experience. These new RPM builds from 4.0 also seem to
> have changed the logging, the server is going to
> /var/log/cloud/management/catalina.out instead of the old
> /var/log/cloud/management/management-server.log, and I haven't yet
> found where the agent is logging, even though the file
> /etc/cloud/agent/log4j-cloud.xml hasn't changed.
> 
> log4j:WARN No appenders could be found for logger
> (com.cloud.utils.component.ComponentLocator).
> log4j:WARN Please initialize the log4j system properly.
> log4j:WARN See http://logging.apache.org/log4j/1.2/faq.html#noconfig
> for more info.
> log4j:ERROR Could not create an Appender. Reported error follows.
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException:
> org.apache.log4j.rolling.RollingFileAppender
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Edison Su <Edison.su@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Yeah, need to install jakarta-taglibs-standard, I think I added it in
> the rpm dependence, but seems not got installed automatically.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marcus Sorensen [mailto:shadowsor@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2012 10:31 AM
> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Cc: Edison Su
> >> Subject: Re: RPM build is fixed, sort of...
> >>
> >> nevermind, just bitten by the stuff not being included anymore and
> had
> >> to install a few more dependencies.
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Marcus Sorensen
> <shadowsor@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > So, the RPMs build fine for me with the current 4.0 tree, but
> >> > installing them and trying to use them, it seems something was
> missed,
> >> > getting a 500 on the client:
> >> >
> >> > The absolute uri: http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core cannot be
> >> resolved
> >> > in either web.xml or the jar files deployed with this application
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 9:40 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Rohit Yadav
> <rohit.yadav@citrix.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 06-Sep-2012, at 3:06 PM, Hugo Trippaers
> >> <HTrippaers@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Hey Edison,
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> That should be easy to do once the build is "mavenized". I'm
> >> starting to seriously dislike waf already, so would be happy to see
> it
> >> go.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> What technical difficulties are you facing with waf? Let's not
> take
> >> decision based on one's preference.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If we decide to get rid of war, then I can try to write cmake
> based
> >> packaging scripts that package debs and rpm.
> >> >>> (I package/release debs/rpm for VideoLAN's VLMC,
> >> https://github.com/bhaisaab/cmakeqt)
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Rohit
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> So I personally don't see why maven + rpmbuild or maven + dpkg
> >> >> couldn't be enough for packaging.
> >> >> Don't we really want people to be able to install CloudStack
> using
> >> >> maven? Certainly from a developer standpoint I think that is an
> end
> >> >> goal. Aside from the fact that it exists, I don't see anything
> that
> >> >> waf currently does that maven can't do.
> >> >>
> >> >> --David

Mime
View raw message