cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Wido den Hollander <w...@widodh.nl>
Subject Re: Review Request: maven kvm hypervisor plugin build without -Dnonoss
Date Thu, 06 Sep 2012 22:38:56 GMT


On 09/07/2012 12:25 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
> You can disable it in the default build, but still allow it in waf
> build, correct? Or at the very least it seems that the RPM build
> should ship building the agent with a message saying 'do x y z to
> enable KVM first' or some such.
>
> Nobody is going to build an RPM and not want KVM support, it's not
> like the citrix or Vmware resources can be used with RHEL/CentOS.
>

I agree with you.

libvirt-java 0.4.9 isn't far away and that will be MIT licensed.

So everything we do will probably be just be very temporary.

Wido

> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/06/2012 08:05 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Trying to get a working RPM build of 4.0 going... I assume my latest
>>>> issue is related to this.  "class not found:
>>>> com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource", if
>>>> someone is building RPMs isn't it safe to assume they want the
>>>> kvm/libvirt pieces?  What was Wido's fix? I don't see this patch
>>>> applied to maven-waf, just 623f199b0378683e6f5f0c2b2b5c692b6504d16f as
>>>> latest.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I completely missed this review!
>>>
>>> The legal issue with KVM was approved like Elan posted, see LEGAL-144 as I
>>> mentioned in the commit message.
>>>
>>> I saw Elan's post on the ml, checked out the legal status and enabled KVM
>>> again since we were allowed to do so :)
>>>
>>> Wido
>>>
>>
>>
>> I am not sure that this is my understanding.
>> Doesn't the 'default build option' have to miss KVM because it
>> currently doesn't have a license that permits it? Or did we decide to
>> identify this as a system dependency?
>>
>> I know we got blessing to produce KVM-inclusive convenience binaries,
>> but point 1 of the accepted proposal in LEGAL-144 says:
>>   Disable KVM support in the default build, as per policy.
>>
>> --David

Mime
View raw message