cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Rohit Yadav" <rohit.ya...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: Review Request: RPMs should include copyright file in doc path
Date Wed, 26 Sep 2012 07:22:22 GMT


> On Sept. 26, 2012, 6:42 a.m., David Nalley wrote:
> > The content that is in the debian/copyright file is the same thing that is on the
source license header - NOTICE and COPYRIGHT would be far more appropriate IMO.

Updated.


- Rohit


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7281/#review11923
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 26, 2012, 7:22 a.m., Rohit Yadav wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7281/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 26, 2012, 7:22 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Prasanna Santhanam, and Wido den Hollander.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Download original patch and git am <patch>: http://bhaisaab.org/patches/cloudstack/0001-RPM-Add-copyright-files-to-rpms.patch
> 
> Patch adds rules in cloud.spec to copy the debian/copyright to the doc path, /usr/share/doc/artifact/
> I used debian/copyright as it's small and to reuse an existing file. We may also add
the NOTICE, LICENSE etc. files.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   cloud.spec 67064b3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7281/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Rohit Yadav
> 
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message