Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Edison.su@citrix.com
 designates 66.165.176.63 as permitted sender)
From: Edison Su <Edison.su@citrix.com>
To: "<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>"
	<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 11:08:39 -0700
Subject: RE: IPtables deb in source repo
Thread-Topic: IPtables deb in source repo
Thread-Index: Ac1yciNe8zKnShkzT1e3jkmrlfMDaABi45Tw
Message-ID: 
 <C66C814C1ABFA8449FF65CB44953A8B4012CB9B1EFBA@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
References: 
 <CAKprHVaDLQk9jh0YeUUJCaJKvN3Ci=Uu9Q5rHAv_MEf0b96v5g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CC4194F0.29CE6%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
 <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D401292FF6AF75@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
 <8998227203571173979@unknownmsgid>
In-Reply-To: <8998227203571173979@unknownmsgid>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Maybe we can switch to Ubuntu 12.04?:
VMware supports it: http://partnerweb.vmware.com/GOSIG/Ubuntu_12_04.html
Xen/KVM supports it by default.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2012 11:51 AM
> To: <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo
>=20
> Not knowing the effort involved, is it crazy to talk about an upgrade
> of the system VM OS?
>=20
> - chip
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone.
>=20
> On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Kevin Kluge <Kevin.Kluge@citrix.com> wrote:
>=20
> >>
> >> I believe it is already in Debian wheezy, so this is actually a
> backport.
> >> Debian backports kernel for Squeeze broke something else (will have
> to dig it
> >> up), so we couldn't use the backports kernel.
> >>
> >> What will break for folks is that:
> >> - if they have a Ubuntu/Debian VM co-hosted on the same Xen
> hypervisor as
> >> the virtual router then DHCP fails.
> >>
> >> The workaround is to patch their dhclient from the Centos repository.
> >>
> >
> > This bug caused a lot of problems.  I'd hate to lose the fix.
> Perhaps we can pull this from some non-ASF repo during build?   Even
> make it optional in the build, default off.
> >
> > -kevin
> >