Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A4D59F2D for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 18:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49850 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2012 18:51:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49822 invoked by uid 500); 4 Aug 2012 18:51:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 49813 invoked by uid 99); 4 Aug 2012 18:51:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 18:51:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.69] (HELO na3sys009aog102.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.69) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 18:51:09 +0000 Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob102.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUB1vCIRkj8qapnExKfclCDS1++P9sbdg@postini.com; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:50:49 PDT Received: by vcbfy27 with SMTP id fy27so1552674vcb.6 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=references:from:in-reply-to:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=vkGYcT2xU9G7u08yZeZaI9fUtPLoZgsfjuPqdt4K8SE=; b=hmEscbuagXu5SbHqS+dj6M+UvOfdszmLzRQtbC+d2irO5nAcs6A7bxMQ98R41BFyaK lFR4YnZJBOmKRsgX7c7Bg7hPm2Db5E/60cYVPvrsNafyJb9VyBZfPaszNayJ1wHnoJ98 ODpyUdwvQB2bZ2zBaETILlEphqdtUs+HxZokhgUAsLk20SDiCmX0N/1Kv4x56xFul0Zw zijlLEB70Kgy1A6sYnHOC3PBGFplxHTFSI0BO++ZMOAeHp1EcEGjiMK5V6GCGhyN97D9 a7Y3x5N4QU3YE2BIXZxI5xH39G931bvzINmvV/X/x5La+yK+2M2lsoxBu2/HUk8toOqG zkRw== Received: by 10.52.174.81 with SMTP id bq17mr3839095vdc.119.1344106247703; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 11:50:47 -0700 (PDT) References: <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D401292FF6AF75@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> From: Chip Childers In-Reply-To: <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D401292FF6AF75@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 14:50:42 -0400 Message-ID: <8998227203571173979@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo To: "" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn4X4boPy0F2SKf7YKMwG5BmmMk+MV++veQEqw9Nc+FSQ0Tb8E/iNTKXCeM9Vgejd++H50e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Not knowing the effort involved, is it crazy to talk about an upgrade of the system VM OS? - chip Sent from my iPhone. On Aug 3, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote: >> >> I believe it is already in Debian wheezy, so this is actually a backport. >> Debian backports kernel for Squeeze broke something else (will have to dig it >> up), so we couldn't use the backports kernel. >> >> What will break for folks is that: >> - if they have a Ubuntu/Debian VM co-hosted on the same Xen hypervisor as >> the virtual router then DHCP fails. >> >> The workaround is to patch their dhclient from the Centos repository. >> > > This bug caused a lot of problems. I'd hate to lose the fix. Perhaps we can pull this from some non-ASF repo during build? Even make it optional in the build, default off. > > -kevin >