Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB0CDD2B8 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78176 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 16:08:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78132 invoked by uid 500); 7 Aug 2012 16:08:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 78124 invoked by uid 99); 7 Aug 2012 16:08:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:08:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jzb@zonker.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.29] (HELO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.29) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Aug 2012 16:08:07 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D81120981 for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:07:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend2.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.161]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Aug 2012 12:07:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=vLCM9W2PS8KuNSZaGl+JbMFB4SM=; b=fD4PeV1h2weUTdO56W3WdlbF9Z6s zaG1oKa8rCRV/8/eKxUzXgtro7j+phlsXDGvloifu3JxDu5JE/STwT4UxzX3s8gj oyBEbffRQ3Uv6A34Tdiz2rdQePCJTOGZW+cpPqOo4tqh2Tso5to7polxiEljOkS9 T0Kz1V3P+fueEWE= X-Sasl-enc: RrXWWee2972F6yO4JLEdi1p5P4HIh+aL/L/GNrHP1Kl3 1344355666 Received: from localhost (unknown [74.207.237.244]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 023624835FC for ; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 12:07:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 16:07:45 +0000 From: Joe Brockmeier To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: CloudStack Events Plans Message-ID: <20120807160745.GA14391@kodos> References: <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D401292FF6AF52@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <018301cd71c5$b29f1b00$17dd5100$@bbits.ca> <048CEC28-6C29-4245-9737-56A85A0E12F0@gmail.com> <20120807152813.GA13256@kodos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:30:00AM -0400, Chip Childers wrote: > On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 06:14:46AM -0400, sebgoa wrote: > >> Shall we create a cloudstack-events mailing list to discuss all of these ? > > > > I'm pretty conservative about creating new lists. If we think the event > > chatter is too much for -dev then we can do this, but if we create a > > separate list we'll miss out on full participation. Some folks who are > > not going to be interested in organizing or participating events all the > > time may miss out when we're discussing/planning events in their > > backyard. > > Would cloudstack-users@ be a better (and broader) list? It would possibly be a broader list. Not sure better, as users is usually the users and -dev is where the doers hang out. (I'm making a *very* broad generalization, of course. Not saying no one on -users is interested in being involved in doing work.) Best, Joe -- Joe Brockmeier http://dissociatedpress.net/ Twitter: @jzb