Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1390D8ED for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81044 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 12:48:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80871 invoked by uid 500); 30 Aug 2012 12:48:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 80857 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2012 12:48:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:48:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jzb@zonker.net designates 66.111.4.25 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.111.4.25] (HELO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.25) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 12:48:10 +0000 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB53120AC1 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:47:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1.nyi.mail.srv.osa ([10.202.2.211]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:47:49 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=K8t+MWXR04uDW448ZrkKL1KHvOs=; b=Wa8b4 AHnUA8shWYufLYjUFelCJasfIU5/2y4WFqqHrYWVpnqzfS7jvvW6vkrtjOjSnLX7 S3wORV9qSrICMEm8n3dj2Ob8nTxDm0WwCd7eJ6zh2uIAfGCnp8/IFME3XEUCymzq EhEu3jAhO+yRqAzCyZRUTyxlzOpJoZEFObcLdg= Received: by web1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 78AFBA00320; Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:47:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1346330869.8865.140661121514621.17CEA18F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 9Sd4x6GKFd5nXUgnzYvZn+sqdJKf0oVx+8q9wisYUDqH 1346330869 From: Joe Brockmeier To: CloudStack Developers MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface Subject: Re: IRC Friday? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 07:47:49 -0500 In-Reply-To: <503F1546.6000805@widodh.nl> References: <1346310236.30277.140661121405729.7F34F33A@webmail.messagingengine.com> <503F1546.6000805@widodh.nl> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012, at 02:24 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 08/30/2012 09:03 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > > CloudOpen and LinuxCon are pretty much consuming all of my available > > cycles this week. Do we have a volunteer to moderate this week's IRC > > meeting on Friday? Several of us are either traveling or attending the > > LF event, but I think consistency is important, so I'd rather not > > abandon the meeting if we're finding it useful. > > > > Do we have meetbot set up already? Last week it wasn't there. I was running meetbot via my laptop, so... we need a way to have it running 24/7, I agree. > Like I said earlier, Friday 19:00 (my time) is not working out that > great, so I'd rather rotate on weekly basis. What time do you propose? > I know the big time difference between the West-Coast and Europe is the > problem. It's certainly a problem. People insist on sleeping and that just slows everything down. Anyway - it was never my intent that we lock in a single time. For this week it might be easier to stick with the same time, but I'm happy to do a different time next week and then rotate. Best, Joe -- Joe Brockmeier jzb@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/