cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [ASFCS40] [DISCUSS] System VM strategy
Date Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:32:01 GMT


On 8/14/12 10:33 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>
wrote:

>
>
>On 8/14/12 6:20 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm trying to kick off conversation with this thread...
>>
>>I know that people have been looking at the System VM licensing and
>>distribution issues from various angles, but I'm not sure we came to a
>>consensus on how to deal with the system VMs overall.
>>
>>AFAIK, we have two outstanding issues:
>>
>>1 - We have a bunch of configuration / code in the patches folder of
>>our source tree that *may* have licensing issues.
>
>IANAL, but config files that do not have license text already should not
>have any issue?
>Especially since there is no other way to configure the software?
>About half the config files are original work (not derived), the rest can
>be supplied as patch files to the originals.
>
>Not sure that supplying patches is any different from distributing
>modified config files though.
>
>
>>2 - We need to initiate a request to ASF Legal for permission to
>>distribute a system VM template (including the GPL OS and software)
>>from ASF infrastructure, OR figure out how the community can
>>distribute valid system VMs outside of ASF.
>
>Wido has some good suggestions here:
>http://goo.gl/EuUoQ
>
>
>1. Host convenience binaries on say Sourceforge
>2. Supply the build script so that folks can build it themselves.

Following up from the IRC discussion:

1. Regarding license of configuration files, I have raised an issue with
Legal: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-146
2. Regarding the iptables deb for fixing dhcp behavior for Ubuntu VMs, I
have a proposal:
   A. Since the system vm cannot be distributed, we will have to host it
as a convenience binary somewhere. This hosted version can certainly have
the DHCP fix
   B. For those who want to build the system vm from scratch, they will
not get the DHCP/iptables fix but are welcome to install the fix as a
post-build procedure.

--
Chiradeep


Mime
View raw message