cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Karasulu <akaras...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2012 08:39:56 GMT
I can help as well but I'm MIA for the next 3 weeks on vacation. I'll start
looking into the current source tree configuration to see how we can
Mavenize.

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Hugo Trippaers <
HTrippaers@schubergphilis.com> wrote:

> Heya,
>
> I have  limited amount of experience with Maven, but I'm willing to help
> out here if we decide to go to maven.
>
> @David, This is a good place to get started:
> http://www.sonatype.com/index.php/Support/Books/Maven-The-Complete-Reference This helped
me a lot when I was converting projects from ant to maven.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Hugo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:17 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more
> >>> than happy to help :)
> >>>
> >>> - Brett
> >>
> >> How much help are you willing to provide? :) I am not sure we have a
> >> lot of maven expertise around, but maybe this provides an even
> >> cleaner way to get rid of waf.
> >
> >
> > As you'd note from my being behind responding to several threads, I
> don't have a lot of bandwidth :) I can help get it started and provide
> assistance, but someone else would need to be driving it - and as others
> have noted, someone actively developing the project should understand how
> it works going forward anyway.
> >
> > I wasn't thinking this was something you planned to do before the 4.0
> release. Is the thought that this might save some of the time on
> release-related activities, or is it an incremental improvement to consider
> beyond that?
> >
>
> I think that folks are thinking after the initial release at this point.
> At least I am.
>
> Where would someone, who understands ant well enough to get things done
> but has had a historically rocky relationship with maven, go to grok maven?
>
> --David
>
> --David
>



-- 
Best Regards,
-- Alex

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message