cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Huang <Alex.Hu...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.
Date Wed, 08 Aug 2012 01:01:00 GMT
The ability to deploy SG in advance zone is not put in simply due to timing constraints.  We
do want to get to it but currently this is not part of cloudstack.

If you don't need SG at all, then you should be able to deploy a share network in advance
zone where vlan is not required at all.

--Alex

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Outback Dingo [mailto:outbackdingo@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 4:29 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: VLANS in Advance Networking NOT NEEDED.
> 
> Just a curiosity, wonder if there way any way to allow advanced networking
> without using VLANS I get the security concept, though i question their use in
> certain configurations and that not everyone can afford the high end
> switches required to maintain a VLAN network.
> Simply put, we should be
> given a choice. I can configure XCP / XEN hosts to do exactly what i want
> without cloudstack, by giving all VMs dual interfaces one for public and one
> for private without issues. As soon as I put CS in the mix I am forced to use
> vlans in my configuration which my current network topology doesnt support.
> and yes, I have two separate physical network segments, so i question why i
> need vlans in the first place as im not running public address space and
> private address space over the same physical network, so why does CS limit
> various hypervisors usage by forcing vlan topologies

Mime
View raw message