cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hugo Trippaers <HTrippa...@schubergphilis.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.
Date Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:31:13 GMT
Heya,

In end both ant and waf will have to go. As per recent discussions we should leave the rpm/deb
building to the distro's and focus in building the jars. In my view also any will be used
less, maybe even the other way around. Use ant called from maven/gradle to do the few things
they can't do well (like building devcloud).

For me a focus on building jars and running the test suite is enough for now. More features
to be added later :-)

Can you send the pom files you have already? I'll add them to the gradle branch so we can
play around a bit.  

Cheers,

Hugo 

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 aug. 2012, at 18:07, "dshepherd@godaddy.com" <dshepherd@godaddy.com> wrote:

> On 2012-08-14 07:23, Chip Childers wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Hugo Trippaers
>> <HTrippaers@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
>>> Hey all,
>>> 
>>> Good to see action on this, we've been discussing this for a long time and I
think we need to get moving. At least on the "building jars" front we seem to be narrowing
down to two contenders maven and grade. Darren is doing the maven thing and I've pushed to
gradle build script to the gradle branch in the ASF repo. (@Darren, feel free to have a look
at it, all the dependencies are in there including version numbers in maven format, might
save you some work)
>>> 
>>> I propose we put it into a vote when Darren is ready and we can do a side-by-side
comparison of gradle versus maven?
>> 
>> +1
>> 
>> Darren, how much time do you think you would need to get something
>> ready for review?
>> 
>>> Next up would be the rpms/deb/snowballs  packaging method, but that is for later
and I think both maven and grade are not ideal choices for this. I'd rather see something
as simple as fpm in there. But that a discussion for another day ;-)
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> 
>>> Hugo
> 
> I'll have something by the end of the week.  The scope of what I'm trying to accomplish
is larger than what has already been done with gradle.  From what I can see the gradle that
has been checked in just builds the jars (which I already have the same in maven).  I'm also
looking to update ant and waf to call maven so that the rpm/deb build process will not require
the files in the deps.
> 
> So if somebody was to run "ant build-all" or "./waf build" it will end up using maven
to produce the jars and whatever artifacts.  The ant/waf part is the hard part.
> 
> Additionally I'm looking at how we can do a fully OSS build and non-OSS build.  So its
no good if we just don't build the jars, because also the component.xml refers to them.
> 
> And finally I'm trying to determine how this will fit into the technical release process.
 Maven or gradle adds additional steps to the process of updating version number and publishing
to repos, so that needs to be integrated.
> 
> So in the end I have a much larger end-to-end picture I'm working on.  Let me know if
you don't want me working on these things.
> 
> Darren

Mime
View raw message