cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ewan Mellor <Ewan.Mel...@eu.citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source releases.
Date Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:21:12 GMT
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Nalley [mailto:david@gnsa.us]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 6:17 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Binaries (jars) in our source tree/source
> releases.
> 
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 09/08/2012, at 3:01 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Brett Porter <brett@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>> If this is a direction CloudStack decides it'd like to go, I'm more
> than happy to help :)
> >>>
> >>> - Brett
> >>
> >> How much help are you willing to provide? :)
> >> I am not sure we have a lot of maven expertise around, but maybe
> this
> >> provides an even cleaner way to get rid of waf.
> >
> >
> > As you'd note from my being behind responding to several threads, I
> don't have a lot of bandwidth :) I can help get it started and provide
> assistance, but someone else would need to be driving it - and as
> others have noted, someone actively developing the project should
> understand how it works going forward anyway.
> >
> > I wasn't thinking this was something you planned to do before the 4.0
> release. Is the thought that this might save some of the time on
> release-related activities, or is it an incremental improvement to
> consider beyond that?
> >
> 
> I think that folks are thinking after the initial release at this
> point. At least I am.

I was thinking the opposite.  Didn't this thread start because the current system isn't fit
for purpose?  I don't want 4.0 going out with a whole bunch of new complex dependencies, and
have users unable to resolve them.  That would be a backward step from what they have today.

Ewan.


Mime
View raw message