Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35854D42D for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 69775 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 21:06:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69748 invoked by uid 500); 31 Jul 2012 21:06:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 69737 invoked by uid 99); 31 Jul 2012 21:06:45 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:06:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of runseb@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:06:39 +0000 Received: by yhjj56 with SMTP id j56so5957289yhj.6 for ; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:06:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=Lj8VzkQ4GKKBtLVWHRXZ2HgWTpLKjp+sqoXRDEeiHi4=; b=JWOlACQFoXse0lWf1VF73NyeghzU5TRMYAmdmA1J1uQGSGcZj1UY1AeGK9tfqJWtFl brTxfTmbmwS2lXSeUuqXkhBw8BcH+zEp/nZJrZ0/yalNh1DmVIzqTSA4F+Gpqud/rYKI 7+kn5kNaVHS4UI53S/KROdhFV2/W0ge2tB7qVN1q4z/dKAF7Si5Tx22/6qSJk6akLykB THOUDTMpUqnBcROLFuDDwXSCVk0WJRBgnreDmAGcjGLvEqJ+q0mWAigg381lUfWgMhpv iitjin3Jp+aT3WuWd8aggFZaTJtYKLN2VBsGLeIj/pVkm9v7b5pTGKfNRGe4GpQBB+Uf lCmg== Received: by 10.101.2.34 with SMTP id e34mr4543645ani.80.1343768778661; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.43.143] ([90.84.144.49]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm1158991ank.9.2012.07.31.14.06.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 14:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: non-committer workflow From: sebgoa In-Reply-To: <501841DE.3000008@widodh.nl> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:05:54 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <96CD3CC7-C796-4892-90DB-381077D2949E@gmail.com> References: <59EF914C-AFDA-4C3F-9F76-3B92F0459E12@gmail.com> <501841DE.3000008@widodh.nl> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jul 31, 2012, at 4:36 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > On 07/31/2012 10:24 PM, sebgoa wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> Since I am new to Cloudstack and Apache like projects, I was looking = at the process for submitting a very small patch (e.g typo, one-liner, = license header) >=20 > Always welcome! >=20 >>=20 >> The wiki page on how to use git o contribute to Cloudstack has a = section for non-committer: >>=20 >> = http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/dev/Git+workflow+in+the+brave+new+world= #Gitworkflowinthebravenewworld-Non-committerworkflow >>=20 >> This is a bit confusing to me, so I would like to get some feedback = from the more seasoned developper and committers: >>=20 >> 1-Does every patch needs to be submitted in response to a filed bug ? >=20 > No, I don't think it needs to. If it's a trivial typo fix it's not = needed. >=20 >> 2-Do we got through https://reviews.apache.org ? So Non-committers don't need to get an account on RB and submit patches = via that path ? >> 3-The wiki mentions sending the patch to dev mailing list with = subject [PATCH] but that's not what I have seen in the last few weeks ? >=20 > Committers don't need to sent their patches over the dev mailinglist. = We haven't seen much external code lately. >=20 >> 4-What's the best way to use git to prepare a small patch (e.g docs = typo, one-liner ...etc), do we really need to create a branch ? how does = it get resolved locally once the patch is accepted ? >=20 > Yes, you still have to branch. The commands: >=20 > $ git clone = https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-cloudstack.git > $ git checkout -b typo-fix > $ vi/nano/vim > $ git commit > $ git format-patch -s master > $ git send-email newly-generated-patch-0001.patch >=20 > Somebody with commit access will pick up that patch and apply if it's = acceptable. >=20 > Wido >=20 >>=20 >> It would be nice to agree on a clear worfklow for non-committers (and = newbies like me) so we can get some people in the mix and graduate to = committers... >>=20 >> Thoughts anyone ? >>=20 >> Thanks, >>=20 >> -Sebastien Goasguen >> Apache Cloudstack Evangelist >> https://sites.google.com/site/runseb/ >>=20 >>=20