Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <790E7BCBCDD98F45BD43B85D7326B8D00B7B5FA6@AMSPRD0702MB124.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: 
 <790E7BCBCDD98F45BD43B85D7326B8D00B7B573F@AMSPRD0702MB124.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
 <CBF6703B.12F14%murali.reddy@citrix.com>
 <790E7BCBCDD98F45BD43B85D7326B8D00B7B5FA6@AMSPRD0702MB124.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
From: David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 10:22:40 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CAKprHVbDG6nhSg0yf0p-_4TWHhP6_6WLp=gR0mUfmt-RDdrTpg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NetScaler Best Practices
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
 <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Paul Angus <paul.angus@shapeblue.com> wrot=
e:
> Thanks Murali,
>
> I think they are questions that need some answers, otherwise we're just b=
lindly guessing. =A0The virtual routers don't give any performance informat=
ion out so we can't monitor them directly to see when a NetScaler might be =
appropriate.
>
> Fine-tuning capacity is ok, but we don't have a number to start with.
>

We've got a number of folks who have modified the systemVMs to provide
perf info over SNMP for that reason - and I think there is a RFE for
that as well.

--David