cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] where to begin the process for Apache CloudStack 4.0.0
Date Sat, 02 Jun 2012 22:38:41 GMT
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:
>
>
> On 06/02/2012 02:22 AM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, that's kind off a Citrix question. Is Citrix interested in
>>>>> having a public branch to work in? From a community perspective it
>>>>> woudl appear that only the master branch is of interest plus any
>>>>> feature branches that are public.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't get the Citrix question?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cirtix has released/is releasing their product from the 3.0.x branch. It
>>> is AFAIK
>>> immaterial to the community. However, if Citrix is interested in keeping
>>> the
>>> 3.0.x branch in the open on the Apache git server, the community should
>>> not
>>> remove the branch as Cirtrix is after all also a member of the community.
>>>
>>> Thus the Citrix connection and the relevance to this discussion.
>>
>>
>> Citrix could continue to do commercial releases off the 3.0.x branch even
>> if it were deleted from the Apache git repo since there are several other
>> places that would still have 3.0.x.
>>
>> I'd ask if anyone (besides Citrix) has cause to be interested in the 3.0.x
>> branch at this point.   If not it seems harmless to delete it, and push
>> focus to master and a new 4.0.x branch.
>
>
> Have we come to a consensus that we will be working in two different
> branches? master and 4.0.x?
>
> I'm still voting for doing all the development in the master branch,
> developing new features in a feature branch and merge them in when they are
> ready.
>
> When we think the master branch has reached the point of a new release we
> tag that release.
>
> A automated build system can then even build packages and tarballs based on
> the tags of the master branch.
>
> I don't like working in two different branches, it makes merging in new
> stuff extra difficult imho.
>
> Wido
>

I think the consensus thus far has been to work in master - and
eventually branch when we get close to release (I am thinking perhaps
the RC timeframe). Feature development can continue moving forward via
topic branches that stay closed based on master. Though I personally
don't want to focus on features until we get the first Apache release
done - there's enough work there for folks to accomplish in and of
itself.

--David

Mime
View raw message