click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Daniel Ford <daniel.clarke.f...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Comparison with Apache Wicket
Date Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:49:14 GMT
Ricardo,

These are very general statements.

click is dead/dying, wicket is alive..

I'd like to hear some technical facts.

Thank you!

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Ricardo Lecheta <rlecheta@gmail.com>wrote:

> click is easy ,wicket is not so easy
> click is small, few things to learn... wicket is bigger
> click is simple, wicket is not so simple
>
> wicket may have more funcionallities, since the goal of click framework is
> make it simple to learn and use.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Daniel Ford <daniel.clarke.ford@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I noticed the mail about stopping development on Click.
>>
>> Can someone of you compare Click with Apache Wicket<http://wicket.apache.org/>?
>> If you have experience with both frameworks I'll be glad to hear what you
>> believe Click does better than Wicket and what is better in Wicket.
>>
>> Thank you in advance!
>>
>> Daniel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ricardo Lecheta
>

Mime
View raw message