click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Md. Jahid Shohel" <development....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Issues or no issue...
Date Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:07:02 GMT
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Bob Schellink <sabob1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 15/06/2010 06:01, Finn Bock wrote:
> >
> > In jira [1] and the development notes for 2.3 [2] there is outlined a
> > desire for a default implementation of the ConfigService. I'm working
> > on this and will welcome your comments when it is ready. Your Click
> > annotations is an obvious candidate for subclassing the
> > DefaultConfigService class instead of XmlConfigService.
>
>
> I agree with this approach. The XmlConfigService methods is tightly coupled
> to XML so exposing those
> methods might lead to subclasses that have to deal with XML as well. With a
> clean default
> implementation we could expose more surface areas for wiring up the
> configuration in different ways.
>
> Yeah this one is better one, and the way it should be. I would really love
to work with this DefaultConfigService, if anyone is not working. Since I am
not a committer, and I don't know how to assign a task to myself. Anyone got
any idea? Because I do not want to work on something which is someone else
is already working on.


Kind regards
>
> Bob
>
>
Regards,


Jahid

Mime
View raw message