click-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Andrei Ionescu (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (CLK-680) [ClickBench] Extend/update with more options.
Date Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:46:13 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12878390#action_12878390
] 

Andrei Ionescu commented on CLK-680:
------------------------------------

Yeah, please update if it's possible to be more realistic (not just two pages).
Also this benchmark:
http://code.google.com/p/perfbench/ 
looks very good (almost a complete app), and it compares many concurrent stacks (except Click
+ Cayenne :( ).

Unfortunately just too users (e.g. like the majority of my team) decide upon a stack based
on such comparison results (see the blog posts for results), and not based on how easy is
to learn the stack or how productive the coding is or how good can the stack prevent errors.

Because of this, the solution looks to be to have all possible bench results that include
Click( + Cayenne) too (and also published, so that users can find them)

> [ClickBench] Extend/update  with more options.
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLK-680
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLK-680
>             Project: Click
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: George Stan
>
> Update/extend ClickBench with:
>  1. the latest stable versions of used frameworks.
>  2. SpringMVC for compare
>  3. Click + Freemarker for compare
>  4. publish the bench results? :).
>  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message