Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-click-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 72664 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2010 07:58:49 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 27 Feb 2010 07:58:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 21101 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2010 07:58:49 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-click-dev-archive@click.apache.org Received: (qmail 21056 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2010 07:58:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@click.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@click.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@click.apache.org Received: (qmail 21049 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2010 07:58:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:58:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of itou.akihiro@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.170] (HELO mail-pv0-f170.google.com) (74.125.83.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 07:58:41 +0000 Received: by pvg7 with SMTP id 7so325370pvg.29 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:58:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+tGGo/Cb9PjJn4BSzMuPqNH4i+sR0JdlMCYZmnH9YX0=; b=GWgwjFRwDHRlUqonbdgwOy5awpuASwEibfi0pG4/AFZa+DchEej7PXGe/Bc+E3SnSU l52++Lbgy5s3AIbj/Ud8z/40QgHFN3M9Z0s7HoySVbHqRKJS03ZFzLN5jkoPKXffPb7e 3Um5Kr+WIX0vlulvV66ZWmi57tU0gGIva95+g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wBY6h0dSgrcVowqpUzcAgNcdJifn2VG7nNuPBh8fwQS77RbwpQDIFS4h8Rv/C+OU1p zZ8c9nYiwqxj8Vq/51q7DOIplFyBRODtmxxMfwQLT+WACC9VAWoq2og8DjFg0exz9zV+ k3ELhJ5MHfjG9HyPxNTkf7pbGD+eQ/x1B8zJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.59.7 with SMTP id h7mr899362wfa.267.1267257498871; Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:58:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B87EBDA.20606@uniplus.hr> References: <4B87EBDA.20606@uniplus.hr> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:58:18 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Deploying click on websphere From: Itou Akihiro To: dev@click.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Ivan, Now I use Click 2.0.1 on WebSphere6.1/JDK1.5(on IBM system i). It works well. Of course without rebuilding. Itou Akihiro 2010/2/27 Ivan Furdi : > Hi everyone, > > I have a question with deploying click app on websphere . > > Im using a IBM WebSphere 6.1 which uses IBM Java 1.5.0. > My question is - should i rebuild all click jar files (sources ) with IBM > java and then deploy it on websphere? > > Does anyone has some experience or advice concerning the subject? > > Thank you , > Ivan Furdi > > >