Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 98774 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2009 06:49:57 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Oct 2009 06:49:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 88584 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 06:49:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-click-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88544 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2009 06:49:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact click-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list click-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 88536 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2009 06:49:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:49:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sabob1@gmail.com designates 209.85.222.191 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.222.191] (HELO mail-pz0-f191.google.com) (209.85.222.191) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Oct 2009 06:49:46 +0000 Received: by pzk29 with SMTP id 29so3598478pzk.22 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mGX1vCZX5kCJCTwZqj57wGhQNM6UClZLwTpSPaBcrpI=; b=vdlv+0EY4a6dp5EAcbQMIGaUJziZb3/bjM4+DMGPjLFDKpIqZFmJsK2ldW0MZdegwh ziX2rFYOAQh0DPaCMoDt95zRwzpVj8nwEmqZBrcfiRzoNKIPcwzmAXcpNLMWT9BS8juE byn8mLeMYKskBQzucF1Bi4WCX9mkygyaZRLZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dq8WdYuUNuE/ZUOLBe600GzR9GP0RjfSpi7iaGe9iDl4GUq3XGoWTB1L87FBcYSMHI rBaVZBDcC1q550m5P8RjFIJmiYvDKhuUHbZLHlV5XfeencazThOoiEsgGKwdEvLqY49r dFsPJzZK44kenn9BDLfDSLNXgBQy9q8NfmENg= Received: by 10.115.151.5 with SMTP id d5mr1771293wao.204.1254811705190; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.2.40? (203-206-172-3.perm.iinet.net.au [203.206.172.3]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 20sm357020pzk.5.2009.10.05.23.48.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 05 Oct 2009 23:48:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ACAE833.60201@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 17:48:19 +1100 From: Bob Schellink User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: click-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Space between AbtractLink image and text Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org AbstractLink renders a space ( ) between the optional image and text. This creates a problem when trying to style the link with CSS especially when trying to drop the underline from the image. Is it OK if we remove this space? Users can use CSS padding instead to control the spacing between the image and text. kind regards bob